THE RESULTS OF THE APPLICATION OF INSECTICIDAL PREPARATIONS DEVIMECTIN ORAL, NEOSTOMOZAN AND ECTOSAN IN THE CONTROL OF IXODID TICKS
Abstract
The methodology employed for the testing of the drugs is almost identical. For the purposes of this study, groups of 5–8 ticks were selected for the experimental and control groups. The number of experimental groups was determined by the number of samples with drug concentrations. In this instance, the number of samples was four, with concentrations ranging from 0.5м0.07 %, 1.0 %, 1.5 %, 3.0 % and 5.0 % of the drug.
The experiments were conducted within the confines of the laboratory. The ticks were positioned centrally on a horizontal tray, which was then covered with either a white cloth or a paper napkin. The drugs were administered at a selected concentration, which was then dispersed in the form of a spray, and subsequently applied to the ticks. Throughout the experiment, the behaviour of the ticks was meticulously monitored, with the time of any slowing down or cessation of activity being recorded. Following the cessation of tick activity, physical irritation was employed to elicit a response, and in the absence of a response, conclusions were drawn about the tick’s demise.
The administration of oral devimectin was found to demonstrate the lowest level of efficacy. It has been established that the drug, when ingested, experiences difficulty in penetrating the tick's membranes. Consequently, the onset of its lethal effect at low concentrations commences a minimum of 60–70 minutes after exposure.
The drug neostromozan has been observed to demonstrate effective penetration through tick membranes at low concentrations (approximately 1 %), while its permeability decreases with increasing concentrations. Concurrently, the lethal effect of the drug increases to 26–28 %. Consequently, in the context of tick control, it is recommended to employ neostomozan at a concentration that does not exceed 1.0 %. It has been observed that this concentration results in a 100 % lethal effect within an exposure time of 18–19 minutes.
The mechanism of action of ectosan is antithetical to that of neostomozan. It is evident that an increase in the concentration of the drug results in a reduction of the time required for the drug to exert its full lethal effect. At a concentration of approximately 1.0 %, the time required for the drug to exert its full lethal effect is approximately 38–39 minutes. However, at a concentration of 5.0 %, the time required for the drug to exert its full lethal effect is reduced to 5-6 minutes.
It has been established that ectosan and neostomozan are the most effective in this regard at concentrations of 3–5 %, with a 100 % lethal effect achieved within 5–10 minutes after these drugs enter the body of ticks.
The investigation established that the drugs could be used to control Ixodes ticks in small natural or urbanised areas in concentrations ranging from 1 to 5 % by spraying them directly onto ticks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
Abbas R. Z. et al. Acaricide resistance in cattle ticks and approaches to its management: The state of play. Veterinary Parasitology. 2014. Vol. 203. No. 1–2. P. 6–20. https://doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.006.
Bakkali F., Averbeck S., Averbeck D., Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils – a review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 446–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106
Castilho R.C., Venancio R. and Narita J.P.Z. Mesostigmata as biological control agents, with emphasis on rhodacaroidea and parasitoidea. In: Carrillo D., de Moraes G.J. and Peña J.E. Prospects for biological control of plant feeding mites and other harmful organisms. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. 2015. P. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15042-0
De la Fuente J., Kocan K.M. & Contreras M. Prevention and control strategies for ticks and pathogen transmission. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 2015. Vol. 34. No. 1. P. 249–264. https://doi: 10.20506/rst.34.1.2357.
George J.E., Pond J.M., Davey R.B. Acaricides for controlling ticks on cattle and the problem of acaricide resistance. In Ticks: Biology, Disease and Control; Bowman, A.S., Nuttall, P., Eds. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. 2008. P. 408–423. https://doi:10.1017/CBO9780511551802.019.
George J. E., Pound J. M., & Davey R. B. Synthetic acaricides: Mechanisms of action and resistance. Pest Management Science. 2019. Vol. 75. no. 7. P. 1623–1631. https://doi:10.1017/S0031182003004682
Gonzaga B. C. F., Barrozo M. M., Coutinho A. L. et al. Essential oils and isolated compounds for tick control: advances beyond the laboratory. Parasites & Vectors. 2023. Vol. 16. No. 415. https://doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05969-w.
Hartelt K., Wurst E., Collatz J. et al. Biological control of the tick Ixodes ricinus with entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes: Preliminary results from laboratory experiments. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2008. No. 298. Supplement 1. P. 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.10.00.
Juergens U.R., Stöber M., Vetter H. Anti-inflammatory activity of 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) in bronchial epithelial cells. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2003. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 113–119. https://doi: 10.1053/rmed.2003.1432.
Levytska V. A., Mushinsky A. B., Zubrikova D., Blanarova L., Długosz E., Vichova B.A, Slivinska K. A., Gajewski Z., Gizinski S., Liu S., Zhou L., Rogovskyy A. S. Detection of pathogens in ixodid ticks collected from animals and vegetation in five regions of Ukraine. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases. 2021. 12 (1): 101586. https://doi: 10.1053/rmed.2003.1432.
Nuttall P. Climate change impacts on ticks and tick-borne infections. Biologia. 2021. Vol. 77. No. 6. https://doi:10.1007/s11756-021-00927-2.
Ortiz-Urquiza A. & Keyhani N. O. Action on the surface: entomopathogenic fungi versus the insect cuticle. Insects. 2013. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 357–374. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects4030357.
Podobivskyi S. S., Lipska V. V., Stravskyi Y. S., Fedoniuk L. Ya. Results of insecticide testing in the control of ixodes ticks. Bulletin of problems biology and medicine. 2024;1(172):106-110. https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2024-1-172-06-110.
Rajput V. D., Singh A., Minkina T. Nano-Enabled Products: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Agriculture. Plants. Vol. 10. Iss. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122727.
Richards S. L., Byrd B. D. and White A. V. Assessing Insecticide Resistance in Adult Mosquitoes: Perspectives on Current Methods. Environmental Health Insights. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178630220952790.
Sparks T. C., & Nauen R. IRAC: Mode of action classification and insecticide resistance management. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 2015. No. 121. P. 122–128. https:// doi.10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.11.014.
Tariq A., Adnan M., Amber R., Pan K., Mussarat S., Shinwari Z.K. Ethnomedicines and anti-parasitic activities of Pakistani medicinal plants against Plasmodia and Leishmania parasites. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016. Vol. 15. No 52. https:// doi: 10.1186/s12941-016-0170-0.
Toxicology of Organophosphate & Carbamate Compounds. Book. /Edited by: Gupta R. C. 2006. https:// doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-088523-7.X5000-5.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Principles. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/safepestcontrol/integrated-pest-management-ipm. 2025.
Welsh J.A.; Braun H.; Brown, N.; Um, C.; Ehret, K.; Figueroa, J.; Boyd Barr, D. Production-related contaminants (pesticides, antibiotics and hormones) in organic and conventionally produced milk samples sold in the USA. Public Health Nutr. 2019. No. 22. P. 2972–2980. https://doi: 10.1017/S136898001900106X.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.25.3.4
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
