DOMINANT SPECIES COMPLEXES IN PLANKTONIC, BENTHIC AND PERIPHYTIC ALGAL METACOMMUNITIES

V. I. Shcherbak, N Ye. Semeniuk, O. A. Davydov, E. Sh. Koziychuk

Abstract


This paper proposes a systematic methodological approach to identifying dominant species complexes in algal metacommunities. The approach was applied during comprehensive studies of plankton, benthos, and periphyton in various lotic and lentic continental ecosystems. The algorithm of the proposed approach consists of the following steps:
- Selecting the dominant species complex based on both cell count and biomass, as algal communities comprise species that vary significantly in cell volume (ranging from a few cubic micrometers to several tens of thousands of cubic micrometers).
- Using relative abundance rather than absolute cell count or biomass to determine dominance, due to the high variability in algal abundance caused by abiotic, biotic, climatic, and anthropogenic factors.
- Differentiating between dominant species (≥10 % of the total cell count or biomass) and subdominant species (5-9.9% of the total cell count or biomass).
- Analyzing the spatial dynamics of dominant species complexes within a metacommunity framework, considering their distribution and interactions across three-dimensional space - i.e., among phytoplankton, benthic, and periphytic algal communities.
The dominant species complexes in lotic and lentic ecosystems may be classified into:
- Monodominant complexes, primarily composed of Bacillariophyta.
- Oligodominant complexes, such as Bacillariophyta-Cyanobacteria and Bacillariophyta-Chlorophyta associations.
- Polydominant complexes, involving Bacillariophyta - Cyanobacteria -Chlorophyta assemblages.
The presence of planktonic Cyanobacteria in periphytic algal communities is attributed to the mass effect - a process in which species sediment from the water column, where they are abundant, onto an atypical habitat, such as hard substrata. Conversely, species may also transition from the substrata into the water column, further supporting the concept of a unified autotrophic network in aquatic ecosystems.
Thus, analyzing the structure of dominant species complexes - while accounting for dominant and subdominant species in planktonic and periphytic algal metacommunities - is a crucial aspect of hydrobiological research in lotic and lentic continental ecosystems of Ukraine.

Keywords


dominant species complex; dominants; subdominants; metacommunities; phytoplankton; benthic algae; periphytic algae; cell count; biomass

References


Biolohichnyi slovnyk / za red. K. M. Sytnyka, V. O. Topachevskoho. Kyiv : URE, 1986. 680 s. [in Ukrainian]

Davydov O. A. Strukturni komponenty mikrofitobentosa iak indykatory vplyvu antropohennykh chynnykiv na vodni obiekty. Nauk. zap. Ternop. nats. ped. un-tu im. Volodymyra Hnatiuka. Seriia: Biolohiia. 2009. T. 3, No 40. S. 47–56. [in Ukrainian]

Maistrova N. V. Riznomanitnist fitoplanktonu Kyivskoho vodoskhovyshcha. Ukrainskyi botanichnyi zhurnal. 2009. T. 66, No 2. S. 220–233. [in Ukrainian]

Pryymachenko A. D. Fytoplankton y pervychnaia produktsyia Dnepra y dneprovskykh vodokhranylyshch. Kyev : Nauk. dumka, 1981. 228 s. [in Russian]

Semeniuk N. Ie. Fitoepifiton vodnykh obiektiv baseinu Dnipra: avtoref. dys. … d-ra biol. nauk. Kyiv, 2020. 40 s. [in Ukrainian]

Shcherbak V. I. Produktsionnie kharakteristiki dominiruiushchikh vidov fitoplanktona dneprovskikh vodokhranilishch. Algologiia. 1998. T. 8, No 3. S. 286–294. [in Russian]

Shcherbak V. I., Semeniuk N. Ie. Strukturno-funktsionalna kharakterystyka fitoplanktonu, dernovyn-podushok, detrytu i iakist vody za osnovnykh abiotychnykh chynnykiv staviv miskoi ahlomeratsii (smt Hostomel, Buchanskyi r-n Kyivskoi obl., Ukraina). Povidomlennia I. Vydove, taksonomichne, ekolohichne riznomanittia fitoplanktonu ta kharakterystyka dernovyn-podushok za osnovnykh abiotychnykh skladovykh stavkiv. Alholohiia. 2023. T. 33, No 1. S. 22–47. https://doi.org/10.15407/alg33.01.022. [in Ukrainian]

Shcherbak V. I., Semeniuk N. Ie. Strukturno-funktsionalna kharakterystyka fitoplanktonu, dernovyn-podushok, detrytu i iakist vody za osnovnykh abiotychnykh chynnykiv staviv miskoi ahlomeratsii (smt Hostomel, Buchanskyi r-n Kyivskoi obl., Ukraina). Povidomlennia II. Kilkisni pokaznyky, dominuiuchi kompleksy fitoplanktonu, detryt ta iakist vody miskykh staviv. Alholohiia. 2023. T. 33, No 2. S. 65–82. https://doi.org/10.15407/alg33.02.065. [in Ukrainian]

Shcherbak V. I., Semeniuk N. Ie., Davydov O. A., Koziychuk E. Sh. Planktonni ta konturni uhrupovannia vodorostei ukrainskoi dilianky r. Zakhidnyi Buh ta ii doplyviv. Povidomlennia 1. Abiotychni skladovi, taksonomichna i ekolohichna kharakterystyky ta florystychni osoblyvosti fitoplanktonu, mikrofitobentosu, fitoperyfitonu. Alholohiia. 2024. T. 34, No 2. S. 130–159. https://doi.org/10.15407/alg34.02.130. [in Ukrainian]

Shcherbak V. I., Semeniuk N. Ie., Davydov O. A., Larionova D. P. Suchasna kharakterystyka fitoplanktonu, mikrofitobentosu ta fitoepifitonu Kanivskoho vodoskhovyshcha. Povidomlennia 1: Taksonomichne, ekolohichne riznomanittia ta prostorovyi rozpodil. Alholohiia. 2023. T. 33, No 3. S. 147–184. https://doi.org/10.15407/alg33.03.147. [in Ukrainian]

Shcherbak V. I., Semeniuk N. Ie., Davydov O. A., Larionova D. P. Suchasna kharakterystyka fitoplanktonu, mikrofitobentosu ta fitoepifitonu Kanivskoho vodoskhovyshcha. Povidomlennia 2: Abiotychni chynnyky, kilkisne riznomanittia, dominuiuchyi kompleks, trofnist ta otsinka yakosti vodnoho seredovyshcha. Alholohiia. 2023. T. 33, No 4. S. 247–277. https://doi.org/10.15407/alg33.04.247. [in Ukrainian]

Shcherbak V. I., Semeniuk N. Ie., Davydov O. A., Larionova D. P. Tablytsia 3. Spysok dominantiv (D) ta subdominantiv (S) fitoplanktonu, mikrofitobentosu i fitoepifitonu Kanivskoho vodoskhovyshcha za chyselnistiu (N) ta biomasoiu (B) u biotopakh u litni periody 2017–2022 rr. Dodatkovi materialy do statti: Suchasna kharakterystyka fitoplanktonu, mikrofitobentosu ta fitoepifitonu Kanivskoho vodoskhovyshcha. Povidomlennia 2: Abiotychni chynnyky, kilkisne riznomanittia, dominuiuchyi kompleks, trofnist ta otsinka yakosti vodnoho seredovyshcha. Alholohiia. 2023. T. 33, No 4. S. 247–277. URL: https://algologia.co.ua/journal/article/view/33.4.247/75 (last accessed: 17.07.2024). [in Ukrainian]

Amano Y., Machida M. Mechanisms of algal species dominance among cyanobacteria, diatoms and green algae as a consequence of phosphorus reduction caused by river water dilution in eutrophic lake. Journal of Water and Environment Technology. 2013. Vol. 11, Issue 5. P. 391–401. http://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.2013.391.

Bruno J. F., Lee S. C., Kertesz J. S., Carpenter R. C., Long Z. T., Duffy J. E. Partitioning the effects of algal species identity and richness on benthic marine primary production. Oikos. 2006. Vol. 115. P. 170–178. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14927.x.

Iacarella J. C., Baroow J. L., Giani A., Beisner B. E., Gregory-Eaves I. Shifts in algal dominance in freshwater experimental ponds across differing levels of macrophytes and nutrients. Ecosphere. 2018. Vol. 9, Issue 1. e02086. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2086.

Jamoneau A., Passy S. I., Soininen J., Leboucher T., Tison-Rosebery J. Beta diversity of diatom species and ecological guilds: Response to environmental and spatial mechanisms along the stream watercourse. Freshwater Biology. 2018. Vol. 63. P. 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12980.

Larose D. T., Larose C. D. Hierarchical and k-mean clustering. In: Data mining and predictive analytics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. P. 523–530.

Odum E. P. Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia : Saunders Co, 1953. 384 p.

Reynolds C. S. Algae. In: River Biota. Diversity and Dynamics. Oxford : Black. Sci., 1996. P. 6–26.

Shcherbak V. I. Photosynthetic activity of dominant species of the Dnieper River phytoplankton. Hydrobiological Journal. 2000. Vol. 36, Issue 2. P. 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1615/HydrobJ.v36.i2.60.

Shcherbak V. I., Kuzmenko M. I. Intensity of photosynthesis by phytoplankton at various depths in the photic zone. Hydrobiological Journal. 1987. Vol. 23, Issue 2. P. 20–23.

Shcherbak V. I., Semeniuk N. Ye., Lutsenko D. A. Diveristy and ecological characteristics of algae in the water column in the subbasin of the large Danube lakes during the autumn-winter period (Ukraine). International Journal on Algae. 2023. Vol. 25, Issue 1. P. 71–94. http://doi.org/10.1615/InterJAlgae.v25.i1.50.

Shcherbak V., Sherman I., Semeniuk N., Kutishchev P. Autotrophic communities’ diversity in natural and artificial water-bodies of a river estuary – A case-study of the Dnieper–Bug Estuary, Ukraine. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology. Vol. 20. P. 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2019.07.001.

Sørensen T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation of Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter. 1948. Vol. 5, Issue 4. 1–46.

Starmach K. Metody badania planktonu. Warszawa: PWN, 1955. 135 s.

Zadorozhna H., Semeniuk N., Shcherbak V. Interaction between phytoplankton and epiphytic algae in the Kaniv Water Reservoir (Ukraine). International Letters of Natural Sciences. 2017. Vol. 61. P. 56–68. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.61.56.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.24.3-4.5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License