PECULIARITIES OF IN VITRO CULTIVATION OF SPECIES OF THE GENUS ARNICA L. IN THE FLORA OF UKRAINE

Yu. M. Taras, O. V. Soroka, M. Z. Prokopiak, L. R. Hrytsak, N. M. Drobyk

Abstract


This article focuses on the study of the peculiarities of in vitro cultivation of species of the genus Arnica L. in the flora of Ukraine, with a specific focus on Arnica montana L. – a valuable medicinal plant facing significant anthropogenic pressure in its natural habitats. Given the species’ high pharmacological value and limited natural resources, the use of biotechnological methods for plant material conservation and reproduction is crucial.
The goal of the study was to optimize conditions for plant introduction into sterile culture, seed germination, microclonal propagation, and induction of callus formation. The initial material consisted of seeds collected from the Ukrainian Carpathians under natural conditions. To obtain aseptic seedlings, seeds were sterilized with a 15 % hydrogen peroxide solution for 20 minutes before being sown on MS/2 medium.
It was found that seeds germinate better under light conditions. Cold stratification (+5–7°C for 1.5–2 months) combined with pre-sowing treatment using gibberellic acid (1000 mg/L) increased germination rates by 1.5–2 times. Seasonal dynamics of germination were observed, with the highest rates in August and the lowest during winter.
To stimulate plant growth and cutting propagation, MS/2 medium supplemented with growth regulators was used. The most favorable conditions for growth were found in the medium containing 0.1 mg/L NAA. The addition of 0.5 mg/L gibberellic acid promoted internode elongation and increased the efficiency of vegetative propagation. The optimal combination for microclonal propagation was 0.2 mg/L IAA, 0.5 mg/L GA₃, and 0.1 mg/L NAA.
The induction of callus formation from leaf, petiole, and root explants was studied on MS and MS/2 media supplemented with different concentrations of 2.4-D. The highest frequency of callus formation was achieved at 0.1 mg/L 2.4-D, with leaf explants showing the highest callusogenic activity. Increasing the auxin concentration led to reduced tissue proliferative capacity and rapid necrosis.
The results demonstrate the potential for efficient in vitro cultivation of A. montana, providing a foundation for gene pool conservation, large-scale propagation, and the production of standardized medicinal raw materials regardless of the state of natural populations.

Keywords


Arnica montana L.; in vitro culture; seed germination; microclonal propagation; callus formation

References


Dubliak A. V., Riznychuk N. I., Hniezdilova V. I. Optymizatsiia umov kultyvuvannia ta farmakolohichna efektyvnist Arnica montana L. Ecological Sciences. 2025. Vyp. 6 (63). S. 239–241. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2025.eco.6-63.37. [in Ukrainian]

Kyrylenko O. M. Optymizatsiia umov kultyvuvannia ridkisnykh likarskykh roslyn. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. 2021. № 5. S. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2025.eco.6-63.37. [in Ukrainian]

Mirutenko V. Poshyrennia arniky hirskoi (Arnica montana L.) na Zakarpatti ta tsenotychna kharakterystyka uhrupovan. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia Biolohiia. 2022. № 53. S. 13–16. https://doi.org/10.24144/1998-6475.2022.53.13-16. [in Ukrainian]

Nad B. B. Bioekolohichni ta biotekhnolohichni osnovy zberezhennia henofondu Arnica montana L. v Zakarpatti: monohrafiia. Berehove: Zakarpatskyi uhorskyi instytut im. Ferentsa Rakotsi II. Uzhhorod: TIMPANI, 2014. 148 s. [in Ukrainian]

Palianychko N. I., Olkhovych S. Ya., Krokhtiak O. V. Suchasnyi stan vyrobnytstva likarskoi roslynnoi syrovyny v Ukraini. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia. 2019. № 2. S. 81–88. https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.2.2019.184161.

Petrina R. O., Masniuk Ya. T. Kalusohenez u kulturi in vitro arniky hirskoi. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». 2008. Vyp. 609. S. 151–155. [in Ukrainian]

Buthuc-Keul A. L., Deliu C. Clonal propagation of Arnica montana L., a medicinal plant. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant. 2001. Vol. 37, no. 5. P. 581–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-001-0102-2.

Jurkiewicz A., Ryszka P., Anielska T., Waligórski P., Białońska D., Góralska K., Tsimilli-Michael M., Turnau K. Optimization of culture conditions of Arnica montana L.: effects of mycorrhizal fungi and competing plants. Mycorrhiza. 2009. Vol. 20, no. 5. P. 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-009-0280-z.

Kostyk Kh V., Lupiy Kh V., Mykytyuk V. S., Krvavych A. S., Petrina R. O. Optimization of the process of extraction of flavonoids from callus biomass of Arnica montana. Chemistry, Technology and Application of Substances. 2018. Vol. 1, no. 1. P. 83–87. https://doi.org/10.23939/ctas2018.01.083.

Krauze-Baranowska M., Kimel K. Arnica montana and its medicinal value in the light of scientific research. Farmacja Polska. 2022. Vol. 78, no. 9. P. 491–502. https://doi.org/10.32383/farmpol/156952.

McCreath S. B., Clement Y. N. Pharmacognosy. 2nd ed. Academic Press, 2023. 819 p.

Medicinal Plants and their Bioactive Compounds in Human Health: Volume 2 / ed. by M. A. Ansari, S. Shoaib, M. A. Barkat. Singapore : Springer Nature Singapore, 2026. 602 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-3620-7.

Nichterlein K. Arnica montana (Mountain Arnica): In Vitro Culture and the Production of Sesquiterpene Lactones and Other Secondary Metabolites. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants VIII. Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995. P. 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08612-4_4.

Nieto-Trujillo A., Cruz-Sosa F., Luria-Pérez R., Gutiérrez-Rebolledo G. A., Román-Guerrero A., Burrola-Aguilar C., Zepeda-Gómez C., Estrada-Zúñiga M. E. Arnica montana Cell Culture Establishment, and Assessment of Its Cytotoxic, Antibacterial, α-Amylase Inhibitor, and Antioxidant In Vitro Bioactivities. Plants. 2021. Vol. 10, no 11. P. 2300. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112300.

Petrova M., Zayova E., Geneva M., Dimitrova L., Vitkova A., Stanilova M. Multiplication and Conservation of Threatened Medicinal Plant Arnica montana L. by in vitro Techniques. Agric. conspec. sci. 2021. Vol. 86, no. 1. P. 57–65.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.25.4.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License