RELATIONSHIP OF THE STRUCTURE, PROPERTIES AND MAIN FIELDS OF USE OF SUCRALOSE
Abstract
Prospective use is as a molecular marker for identification of pollution sources of natural water bodies. Scientists have established that such sugar substitutes as saccharin, aspartame and cyclamates decompose in the environment, and sucralose and its derivatives (salts and esters) were present in soil and wastewater, which is a sign of its accumulation in the environment. Bacterial strains performing the function of reductants will gradually decrease in the presence of sucralose, which will lead to a change in ecosystem. Given that bacterial colonies can convert sucralose into dichloraldehydes, which are toxic, it is necessary to investigate the impact on the life processes of organisms in the relevant water bodies. When processing library sources, it was found that sucralose suppresses the growth of roots, asexual reproduction of some river algae. This is what prompted us to analyze the literature on the properties of sucralose and the safety of its use in various industries.
References
Kosiv R. Pidsolodzhuvalni rechovyny: klasyfikatsiia, vlastyvosti, zastosuvannia v tekhnolohii bezalkoholnykh napoiv. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia: Novi rishennia u suchasnykh tekhnolohiiakh. 2023. No 4 (18). S. 51–57. [in Ukrainian]
Kravchenko I. Y. Pidkhody do vyznachennia otsinky ta klasyfikatsii rechovyn iz solodkym smakom. Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoho universytetu kharchovykh tekhnolohii. 2020. T. 26, No 1. S. 71–81. [in Ukrainian]
Abou-Donia MB, El-Masry EM, Abdel-Rahman AA, McLendon RE, Schiffman SS. Splenda alters gut microflora and increases intestinal p-glycoprotein and cytochrome p-450 in male rats. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2008. Part A, 71 (21):1415–29. doi: 10.1080/15287390802328630. PMID: 18800291.
Bornemann V., Werness S. C., Buslinger L., & Schiffman S. S. Intestinal metabolism and bioaccumulation of sucralose in adipose tissue in the rat. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 2018. Part A, 81 (18), S. 913–923.
Durán Agüero S., Angarita Davila L., Escobar Contreras M. C., Rojas Gomez D., & de Assis Costa J. Noncaloric sweeteners in children: a controversial theme. BioMed research international. 2018. 4806534.
Durán Agüero, S., Angarita Davila L., Escobar Contreras M. C., Rojas Gomez D., & de Assis Costa J. Noncaloric sweeteners in children: a controversial theme. BioMed research international. 2018. (1). 4806534.
Ford HE, Peters V, Martin NM, Sleeth ML, Ghatei MA, Frost GS, Bloom SR. Effects of oral ingestion of sucralose on gut hormone response and appetite in healthy normal-weight subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011. 65(4). 508–513.
Risdon S., Battault S., Romo-Romo A., Roustit M., Briand L., Meyer G., ... & Walther G. Sucralose and cardiometabolic health: current understanding from receptors to clinical investigations. Advances in Nutrition. 2021. 12 (4). 1500–1513.
Schiffman S. S., Rother K. I. Sucralose, a synthetic organochlorine sweetener: overview of biological issues. Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2013; 16 (7): 399–451.
Suez J., Korem T., Zeevi D., Zilberman-Schapira G., Thaiss C. A., Maza O., & Elinav E. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. 2014. 514 (7521). 181–186.
Yunker A. G., Alves J. M., Luo S., Angelo B., DeFendis A., Pickering T. A., & Page K. A. Obesity and sex-related associations with differential effects of sucralose vs sucrose on appetite and reward processing: a randomized crossover trial. JAMA network open. 2021. 4 (9), 2126313-e2126313.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.25.1-2.3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
