CONTENT OF MINERAL ELEMENTS IN FRUITS OF LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM MILL. UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF TREVITAN® COMPOSITE RECULTIVATOR

A. Dzendzel

Abstract


The article presents the results of research on the effect of the Trevitan® composite recultivator on the elemental composition and ratio of macroelements in the fruits of the F1 Talent edible hybrid tomato. Field experiments with edible tomato were carried out in the conditions of the Western Forest Steppe of Ukraine on meadow-chernozem medium loam soils in 2021. The soil of the experimental field was characterized by a neutral reaction (pH=7,12), a low content of mobile compounds of macronutrients, and of trace elements (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn). In the studies, Trevitan® composite recultivator was used – a product of organic origin for rapid soil regeneration, processing of seeds and planting material of various agricultural crops, acceleration of plant growth and development. Trevitan® is a liquid with a pH=7.5-10.9 and a mass fraction of organic matter of 50-80 % on the dry substance of the preparation. Trevitan® was applied by autumn soil treatment before plowing, seed and plant treatment during the growing season.
The use of Trevitan® compound recultivator in the technology of growing the Talent hybrid tomato influenced the indicators of the content of macro- and microelements, mainly by increasing their content. The content of Nitrogen, Potassium and Magnesium in the fruits of experimental plants compared to the control increased by 21,0, 31,6 and 43,3%, respectively. The amount of nitrogen in the fruits did not exceed the permissible level, which is an important characteristic of the quality of the fruits. It has been established that the use of Trevitan® composite recultivator helps to improve the mineral composition and biological value of tomato fruits, to increase the content of Manganese, Copper, Zinc and Potassium in them, while optimizing nutrition in the soil-plant system.

Keywords


edible tomato; Trevitan® compound recultivator; mineral elements; macroelements; microelements; coefficient of biological accumulation

References


Vyrodov O. S., Yaremenko S. S. Yakist pereroblenoi ovochevoi produktsii zalezhno vid riznykh system udobrennia. Roslynnytstvo. 2013. № 17. S. 50–54. [in Ukrainian]

Deinychenko H. V., Yudicheva O. P. Vykorystannia tradytsii biofortyfikatsii dlia rehuliuvannia khimichnoho skladu tomatnykh ovochiv. Kharchova nauka i tekhnolohiia. 2012. № 2 (19). S. 42–45. [in Ukrainian]

Dushchak O. V., Bessarab O. S., Shutiuk V. V. Doslidzhennia vplyvu khimichnoho skladu novykh sortiv tomativ na yakisni kharakterystyky kontsentrovanykh tomatoproduktiv. Prodovolchi resursy. 2021. T. 9, № 17. S. 65–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/10.31073/foodresources2022-18.

Koziarin I. P. Rol vitaminiv u zberezhenni zdorovia liudyny. Hihiiena naselenykh mist. 2003. Vyp. 42. S. 426–433. [in Ukrainian]

Metody analiziv gruntiv i roslyn : metodychnyi posib. / za red. S. Yu. Bulyhina ta in. Kharkiv, 1999. S. 127–132. [in Ukrainian]

Orhanycheskoe proyzvodstvo / H. Y. Bohach, S. R. Zubachev, P. A. Shablyn, A. S. Tertyshnyi. Donetsk : Format Plius, 2007. 66 s. [in Russian]

Perelman A. Y. Heokhymyia. Moskva : Vysshaia shkola, 1989. 582 s. [in Russian]

Plys Ya. V. Vplyv huminovykh preparativ na produktyvnist ovochevykh kultur. Aktualni problemy ta naukovi zvershennia molodi na pochatku tretoho tysiacholittia : zb. materialiv V nauk.-prak. konf. studentiv, mahistrantiv ta aspirantiv, 19 lyst. 2020 r. Sloviansk, 2020. S. 47–48. [in Ukrainian]

Radov A. S., Pustovoi Y. V., Korolkov A. V. Praktykum po ahrokhymyі / pod red. Y. V. Pustovoho. Moskva : Ahropromyzdat, 1985. 312 s. [in Russian]

Rozroblennia blok-skhemy vyrobnytstva tomatnoho ketchupu na osnovi kontsentrovanykh tomatoproduktiv / M. I. Valko ta in. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu silskoho hospodarstva. № 1 (64), 2018. S. 103–108. [in Ukrainian]

Skaletska L. F., Podpriatov H. I., Zavadska O. V. Metody naukovykh doslidzhen zi zberihannia ta pererobky produktsii roslynnytstva : navch. posibnyk. Kyiv : Komprynt, 2014. 416 s. [in Ukrainian]

Skrylnyk Ye. V., Halushka S. V. Efektyvnist dii novykh orhano-mineralnykh dobryv na urozhai zelenoi masy kukurudzy ta elementy rodiuchosti chornozemu opidzolenoho vazhkosuhlynkovoho. Visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Ser. Ahronomiia. 2008. № 12 (1). S. 86–92. [in Ukrainian]

Tekhnichni umovy TU U 20.1-44141048-002:2021. Rekultyvant kompozytsiinyi. [Chynni vid 2021-04-12]. Zhytomyr : Zhytomyrstandartmetrolohiia, 2021. [in Ukrainian]

Fedorov A. O., Shkabara T. L., Fedorova V. O. Spozhyvcha kharakterystyka mikrokomponentiv kharchovykh produktiv. Tekhnolohiia kharchuvannia i tovaroznavstvo. 2013. № 2. S. 367–374. [in Ukrainian]

Yarovyi V., Romanov O., Romanova T. Doslid shchodo zastosuvannia biostymuliatora Vuksal BIO Aminoplant na kapusti biloholovii. Plantator. 2020. № 3 (51). S. 58–59. [in Ukrainian]

Carricondo-Martínez I., Berti F., Salas-Sanjuán M. d. C. Different organic fertilization systems modify tomato quality : an opportunity for circular fertilization in intensive horticulture. Agronomy. 2022. № 12. Р. 174–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010174.

Combining ability analysis for yield, quality, earliness, and yield-attributing traits in tomato / A. Agarwal et al. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 2017. № 23 (6). Р. 605–615. DOI: 10.1080/19315260.2017.1355864.

Content of mineral N in soil and tomato yields considering fertigation and mulch / D. Jungić et al. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus. 2017. № 82 (4). Р. 361–365. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/193523 (Last accessed: 02.10.2020).

Effect of organo-mineral fertilizer on tomato fruit production and incidence of blossom-end rot under salinity / K. Kataoka et al. The Horticulture Journal. 2017. № 3. Vol. 86. P. 357–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2503/hortj.OKD-041.

The impact of organic farming on quality of tomatoes is associated to increased oxidative stress during fruit development / A. B. Oliveira et al. PLoS ONE. 2013. № 8 (2). Р. 56–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056354.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.22.3.8

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License