BIOCHEMICAL PROFILE AND ENZYMES ACTIVITY OF HENS BLOOD SERUM UNDER CHANGES OF HEIGHT OF AN ARRANGEMENT OF CAGE BATTERIES

M. Sakhatsky, Yu. Osadcha

Abstract


In the conditions of industrial poultry farming, the body of hens is constantly exposed to numerous technological stressors, the least studied of which are long-term, which can cause the development of chronic stress. One such technological stressor may be to increase the tier of cage equipment, which is a method of resource conservation in egg poultry and is often used by producers to obtain more eggs from 1 m2 of poultry area. Increasing the level of cage equipment involves the location of the cage in 12 and even 15 tiers, forming 4–5 floors. This allows to increase the concentration of poultry in the poultry house by 4-5 times, compared with 3-tier cage batteries, and 8-10 times – compared to the floor method of keeping. For this livestock in one poultry house can reach 590 thousand hens. However, there are no data on the impact of such a keeping method on the physiological state of hens, and the current rules of VNTP-APK-04.05. for keeping hens in cages designed for 1-3-tier cage batteries. The aim of this work was to study the physiological state of the hen’s body based on the analysis of the biochemical profile and the activity of serum enzymes in their blood depending on the height of the cage batteries. For this purpose, in the conditions of a modern complex for the production of food eggs in one poultry house, 4 groups of hens were formed, each of which was kept on a separate floor-analogue in terms of area and cage equipment. Each floor was equipped with 3-tier cage batteries “Big Dutchman” (Germany), consisting of 1176 cages. It was found that increasing the layering of cage equipment does not have a negative impact on the hen’s body. So, for keeping hens in cages of multilevel cages batteries located on 2-4 floors (4-12 tiers), the biochemical status and activity of their blood serum enzymes were within the physiological norm. In hens kept in cages of the 3rd floor there was an increase, within the physiological norm, aspartate aminotransferase by 7.9%, and in hens of the 2nd floor there was an increase in glucose by 4.6-6.5%, creatinine – by 2.4%, phosphorus by 8.8-9.6%, as well as an increase in the activity of aspartate aminotransferase by 2.2-10.2% and lactate dehydrogenase – by 11.2%. Whereas, when keeping hens in cages of a multi-tiered cage battery on the first floor, there was an increase in glucose levels by 60.5-71.0% (10.9% ˃ of normal), creatinine – by 9.7-12.3% (4.8 % ˃ norm), phosphorus – 82.6–100.0% (23.6% ˃ norm), a decrease in the ratio of calcium and phosphorus by 46.7-50.0% (46.7% ˂ norm), which was confirmed by an increase in alkaline phosphatase activity by 22.3-27.0% (3.4% ˃ normal), as well as an increase in aspartate aminotransferase activity by 3.2-13.8% (1.7% ˃ normal), lactate dehydrogenase – by 48.5-65.1% (10.8% ˃ of normal) and gamma-glutamyltransferase – by 16.4-20.6%. Thus, the main effects of chronic stress caused by keeping hens in the cells of the lower floor of a multi-tiered cage battery are reflected in the biochemical parameters of their serum, namely increased glucose, creatinine, enzyme activity and change of the ratio of calcium and phosphorus.

Keywords


laying hens; chronic stress; cages battery; glucose; creatinine; enzyme activity

References


Bueno J. P., Nascimento M. R., Martins J., Marchini C. F., Gotardo L. R., Sousa G. R., Mundim A. V., Guimarães E., Rinaldi F. P. Effect of age and cyclical heat stress on the serum biochemical profile of broiler chickens. Semina-ciencias Agrarias, 2017. Vol. 38 (3). Р. 1383–1392. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2017V38N3P1383

Downing J. Оn-invasive assessment of stress in commercial housing systems. North Sydney, Australian Egg Corporation Limited, 2012. 69 р.

Ericsson M., Henriksen R., Bélteky J., Sundman A. S., Shionoya K., Jensen P. Long-Term and Transgenerational Effects of Stress Experienced during Different Life Phases in Chickens (Gallus gallus). PloS one, 2016. Vol. 11(4), e0153879. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153879.

Goel A. Heat stress management in poultry. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2021. Vol. 00. Р. 1–10. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13496

González F. H. D., Silva S. C. Introdução à bioquímica clínica veterinária. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2006. 364 p.

Guo Y., Song Z., Jiao H., Song Q., Lin H. The effect of group size and stocking density on the welfare and performance of hens housed in furnished cages during summer. Animal Welfare Jornal, 2012. Vol. 21. Р. 41–49. doi: 10.7120/096272812799129501

Gupta S. K., Behera K., Pradhan C. R.,Acharya A. P., Sethy K., Behera D., Lone S. A. Shinde K. P. Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics,hemato-biochemical indices of Vanaraja chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 2017. Vol. 51 (5). Р. 939–943. doi: 10.18805/ijar.10989

Hall J. M., Witter A. R., Racine R. R., Berg R. E., Podawiltz A., Jones H., Mummert M. E. Chronic psychological stress suppresses contact hypersensitivity: Potential roles of dysregulated cell trafficking and decreased IFN-γ production. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2014. Vol. 36. Р. 156–164. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2013.10.027.

Hedlund L., Whittle R., Jensen P. Effects of commercial hatchery processing on short- and long-term stress responses in laying hens. Scientific Reports, 2019. № 9. Р. 1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38817-y.

Infante M., Armani A., Mammi C., Fabbri A., Caprio, M. Impact of adrenal steroids on regulation of adipose tissue. Comprehensive Physiology, 2017. Vol. 7(4). Р. 1425–1447. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160037.

Koronowicz A. A., Banks P., Szymczyk B., Leszczyńska T., Master A., Piasna E., Szczepański W., Domagała D., Kopeć A., Piątkowska E., Laidler P. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid affects blood parameters, liver morphology and expression of selected hepatic genes in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 2016. Vol. 57(5). Р. 663–673. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2016.1192280.

Kraus A., Zita L., Krunt O., Härtlová H., Chmelíková E. Determination of selected biochemical parameters in blood serum and egg quality of Czech and Slovak native hens depending on the housing system and hen age. Poultry Science, 2021. Vol. 100 (2). Р. 1142–1153, doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.039.

Kudair I. M., Al-hussary N.A.J. Effect of vaccination on some biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2010. Vol. 24. Р. 59–64. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2010.5604

Lara L.J., Rostagno M.H. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals (Basel), 2013. Vol.3(2). Р. 356–369. doi: 10.3390/ani3020356.

Lin H., Decuypere E., Buyse J. Acute heat stress induces oxidative stress in broiler chickens. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 2006. Vol. 144. Р. 11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.01.032.

Mert N. I., Yildirim B. A. Biochemical Parameters and Histopathological Findings in the Forced Molt Laying Hens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 2016. Vol. 18 (4). Р. 711–718. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0032.

Mikami T., Sumida S., Ishibashi Y., Ohta S. Endurance exercise training inhibits activity of plasma GOT and liver caspase-3 of mice [correction of rats] exposed to stress by induction of heat shock protein 70. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2004. Vol. 96. Р. 1776–1781. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00795.2002

Nwaigwe C. U., Ihedioha J. I., Shoyinka S. V., Nwaigwe C. O. Evaluation of the hematological and clinical biochemical markers of stress in broiler chickens. Veterinary World, 2020. Vol. 13(10). Р. 2294–2300. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.2294-2300.

Odihambo Mumma J., Thaxton J.P., Vizzier-Thaxton Y., Dodson W.L. Physiological Stress in Laying Hens1, Poultry Science, 2006. Vol. 85 (4). Р. 761–769. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.4.761.

Olubodun J., Zulkifli I., Hair-Bejo M., Kasim A., Soleimani, A.F. Physiological response of glutamine and glutamic acid supplemented broiler chickens to heat stress. European Poultry Science, 2015. Vol. 79. Р. 1–12. doi: 10.1399/eps.2015.87.

Pavlík A., Pokludová M., Zapletal D., Jelínek P. Effects of housing systems on biochemical indicators of blood plasma in laying hens. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 2007. Vol. 76. Р. 339–347. doi: 10.2754/avb200776030339.

Puvadolpirod S., Thaxton J. P. Model of physiological stress in chickens 1. Response parameters. Poultry Science, 2000. Vol. 79(3). Р. 363–369. doi: 10.1093/ps/79.3.363.

Rajman M., Juráni M., Lamosová D., Mácajová M., Sedlacková M., Kost’ál L., Jezová D., Výboh P. The effects of feed restriction on plasma biochemistry in growing meat type chickens (Gallus gallus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 2006. Vol. 145(3). Р. 363–371. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.07.004.

Ruiz-Jimenez F., Gruber E., Correa M., Crespo R. Comparison of portable and conventional laboratory analyzers for biochemical tests in chickens. Poultry Science, 2021. Vol. 100(2). Р. 746–754. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.060.

Sakhatsky M., Osadcha Yu., Kuchmistov V. Reaction of the reproductive system of hens to the chronic stressor. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2020. Vol. 10(4). Р. 6–11. doi: 10.15421/2020_159.

Sandercock D. A., Hunter R. R., Mitchell M. A., Hocking P. M. Thermoregulatory capacity and muscle membrane integrity are compromised in broilers compared with layers at the same age or body weight. British Poultry Science, 2006. Vol. 47. Р. 322–329. doi: 10.1080/00071660600732346.

Shevchuk M., Stoyanovskyy V., Kolomiiets I. Technological stress in poultry. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Veterinary Sciences, 2018. Vol. 20(88). Р. 63–68. doi: 10.32718/nvlvet8811.

Sloan E. K., Priceman S. J., Cox B. F., Yu S., Pimentel M. A., Tangkanangnukul V., Arevalo J. M., Morizono K., Karanikolas B. D., Wu L., Sood A. K., Cole S. W. The sympathetic nervous system induces a metastatic switch in primary breast cancer. Cancer research, 2010. Vol. 70(18). Р. 7042–7052. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0522.

Virden W., Kidd M. Physiological stress in broilers: Ramifications on nutrient digestibility and responses. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2009. Vol. 18. Р. 338–347. doi: 10.3382/japr.2007-00093.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.21.3.3

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License