EFFICIENCY OF USING ORGANIC-MINERAL FERTILIZERS IN THE GROWING OF EDIBLE TOMATO (LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM MILL.)

А. Yu. Dzendzel, Yu. D. Martsinyshyn, S. V. Pyda

Abstract


The review analyzes the effect of organic-mineral fertilizers (OMF) on morphogenesis, physiological processes, productivity and fruit quality of edible tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Tomatoes are known to play a primary role in providing the population with quality vegetable products, due to a large number of sugars (2.5–4.2 %), organic acids (0.4–0.9 %), vitamins, lycopene (0.3 %), fiber (0.3–0.9 %), mineral and aromatic compounds. The annual rate of human consumption of tomatoes, according to scientists, should be 39 kg.
It is noted that the use of OMF and humic preparations is an integral part of organic farming. According to DSTU ISO 4884: 2007 organic-mineral fertilizer is a fertilizer obtained by physical and / or chemical interaction of organic and mineral components.
Growing tomatoes using organic technology reduces the size of the fruit, but makes tomatoes more tasteful compared to fruits grown in the traditional way, the accumulation in the fruit of useful iron, magnesium, vitamins and minerals. It is shown that humic compounds have a positive effect on all phases of the mitotic cycle of cells and increase the value of the mitotic index by 1.5 times, resulting in increased root formation, changes of cell membranes increase water supply and nutrients. Treatment of seeds before sowing with liquid complex nitrohumine fertilizer containing macro- and microelements increases germination by 10%. Feeding tomato plants with liquid OMF during the growing season allows to intensify the process of photosynthesis, ensure better development of the leaf surface and root system, increase the laying of more reproductive organs and reduce disease incidence, resulting in a 40 % increase in yield and improved quality. The stimulating effect of humic acids on rooting of tomato seedlings, growth processes, increase of resistance to temperature decrease is revealed.
Growth stimulants and liquid nitrogen fertilizers also streamline growth, increase productivity and quality of tomatoes.
Thus, the use of organic-mineral fertilizers based on humic substances affects the development of edible tomatoes, streamlines the physiological processes in plants, their resistance to abiotic and biotic factors, fruit yield by 26–51 % and their quality, morpho-biometric and biochemical parameters of seedlings.

Keywords


edible tomato; organic-mineral fertilizers; physiological processes; productivity

References


Aleksandrova L. N. Izuchenie protsessov gumifikatsii rastitelnyih ostatkov i prirodyi novoobrazovannyih gumusovyih kislot. Pochvovedenie. 1972. № 7. S. 37–46. [in Russian]

Aliev S. A. Ekologiya i energetika biohimicheskih protsessov prevrascheniya organicheskogo veschestva pochv: monografiya. Baku : ELM, 1978. 253 s. [in Russian]

Alpatov A. V. Pomidoryi: monografiya. Moskva : Kolos, 1981. 304 s. [in Russian]

Antonova O. I., Krapivina M. V., Tretyakova M. N. Primenenie guminovyih udobreniy v selskom hozyaystve. Biysk, 2000. 112 s. [in Russian]

Bogoslovskiy V. N., Levinskiy B. V., Syichev V. G. Agrotehnologii buduschego. Moskva : Izd. RIF «Antikva», 2004. S. 26–27. [in Russian]

Vliyaniya preparata Amerol-2000 na morfologicheskie parametryi i holodoustoychivost rasteniy tomata / Astahova N. V., Suvorova T. A., Deryabina A. N., Trunova T. I. Agrohimiya. 2010. № 2. S. 21–25. [in Russian]

Vliyaniya preparatov guminovoy prirodyi na prorastaniya semyan i rost seyantsev tomata / T. N. Saharchuk, V. D. Poliksenova, G. V. Naumova, N. L. Makarova. Vestnik BGU. Ser. 2. Himiya. Biologiya. Geografiya. 2012. № 2 S. 53–57. URL: http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/45350. [in Russian]

Vovkotrub M. P., Muliarchuk I. F., Horodnii M. M. Vyrobnytstvo mineralnykh ta orhano-mineralnykh dobryv. Naukovyi visnyk NAU. 2005. № 87. S. 134–140. URL: http://www.nauu.kiev.ua. [in Ukrainian]

Voropaev S. N. Biologicheskaya sistema zemledeliya / pod red. V. D. Ermohina. M. : Kolos, 2009. – 192 s. [in Russian]

Havryliuk V. A., Demchuk S. M. Orhano-mineralni dobryva – kompleksne vyrishennia vykorystannia syrovynnykh resursiv. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal. 2013. № 4. S. 78–81. [in Ukrainian]

Gavrish S. F., Galkina S. N. Tomat: vozdelyivanie i pererabotka. Moskva : Rosagropromizdat, 1990. 190 s. [in Russian]

Gorovaya A. I., Yarchuk I. I. Znachenie rabot L. A. Hristevoy v nauke o fiziologicheski aktivnih veschestvah gumusovoy prirodyi. Guminovyie veschestva v biosfere. Moskva : Nauka, 1993. S. 6–15. [in Russian]

Guminovyie veschestva v biosfere / pod red. D. S. Orlova. M. : Nauka, 1993. 238 s. [in Russian]

Deinychenko H. V., Yudicheva O. P. Vykorystannia tradytsii biofortyfikatsii dlia rehuliuvannia khimichnoho skladu tomatnykh ovochiv. Kharchova nauka i tekhnolohiia. 2012. № 2 (19). S. 42–45. [in Ukrainian]

DSTU ISO 4884:2007. Dobryva orhanichni ta orhano-mineralni. Terminy ta vyznachennia poniat. [Chynnyi vid 2009-01-01]. Kyiv, 2010. 34 s. (Informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia). [in Ukrainian]

Dubinina A. A., Shaporova T. M., Olkhovska V. S. Proektuvannia tomatoproduktiv z zadanym kompleksom pokaznykiv kharchovoi tsinnosti. Visnyk KhNTU. 2005. Vyp. 38. S. 128–134. [in Ukrainian]

Ermohin Yu. I., Nevenchannaya N. M. Zavisimost pokazateley kachestva rassadyi i velichinyi urozhaynosti tomatov pri ispolzovanii razlichnyih organo-mineralnyih tabletok. Omskiy nauchnyiy vestnik. 2006. № 1 (34). S. 172–175. [in Russian]

Kalytka V. V., Karpenko K. M. Vplyv riznykh kontsentratsii rehuliatora rostu AKM na posivni yakosti nasinnia ta biometrychni parametry rozsady pomidora. Naukovyi visnyk NUBiP. Seriia – Ahronomiia, Chastyna persha. Kyiv, 2011. Vyp. 162. C. 247–252. [in Ukrainian]

Kalytka V. V., Karpenko K. M. Vplyv rehuliatora rostu AKM na pihmentnyi kompleks ta fotosyntetychnu produktyvnist roslyn pomidora. Naukovyi visnyk NUBiP. Seriia – Ahronomiia, Chastyna persha. Kyiv, 2013. Vyp.183. S. 72–77. [in Ukrainian]

Karpenko K. M. Tekhnolohichni ta biolohichni osoblyvosti formuvannia produktyvnosti pomidora za orhanichnoho vyrobnytstva v umovakh Pivdennoho Stepu Ukrainy : dys. … k-ta s.-h. nauk : 06.01.06 / Melitopol. Tavriiskyi derzhavnyi ahrotekh. un-t. Uman. Umanskyi nats. un-t sadivnytstva. Melitopol, 2019. 194 s. [in Ukrainian]

Kiriziy D. A., Stasik O. O., Pryadkina G. A., Shadchina T. M. Fotosintez. T. 2. Assimilyatsiya SO2 i mehanizmyi ee regulyatsii. Kiev: Logos, 2014. 478 s. [in Russian]

Kuriata V. H., Kravets O. O. Rehuliatsiia morfohenezu, pererozpodilu asymiliativ, azotovmisnykh spoluk ta produktyvnosti tomativ za dii hiberelinu y retandantu folikuru. Fyzyolohyia rastenyi y henetyka. 2018. T. 50. № 2. S. 95–104. [in Ukrainian]

Kurbatov M. S., Nazarova N. I., Yasyinov R. Vliyanie guminovyih udobreniy na urozhaynost selskohozyaystvennyih kultur v Kirgizii. Guminovyie udobreniya. Teoriya i praktika ih primeneniya. Kiev, 1968. Ch. 3. S. 372–374. [in Russian]

Motovilova L. V., Berman O. N., Skvortsov O. V. Gumatyi ekologicheski chistyie stimulyatoryi rosta i razvitiya rasteniy. Himiya v selskom hozyaystve. 1994. № 5. S. 12–13. [in Russian]

Naukovi osnovy vyrobnytstva orhanichnoi produktsii v Ukraini: monohrafiia / za red. Ya. M. Hadzala, V. F. Kaminskoho. K. : Ahrarna nauka, 2016. 592 s. [in Ukrainian]

Nikiforova K. V., Petrov A. F., Mitrakova A. G. Izuchenie vliyaniya biologicheskogo preparata «Fitop 8.67-8» i Eksperimentalnogo organomineralnogo preparata «Agrofit-gumat-V» na urozhaynost tomatov. Teoriya i praktika sovremennoy agrarnoy nauki: sb. III Natsional. (vserossiyskoy) nauch. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem., 28 fevralya 2020 g. Novosibirsk : Zolotoy kolos, 2020. S. 204–207. [in Russian]

Organicheskoe proizvodstvo / Bogach G. I., Zubachev S. R., Shablin P. A., Tertyishnyiy A. S. Donetsk : Format Plyus, 2007. 66 s. [in Russian]

Perminova I. V., Zhilin D. M. Guminovyie veschestva v kontekste zelenoy himii. Moskva : Izd-vo MGU, 2004. S. 146–162. [in Russian]

Perminova I. V. Guminovyie veschestva – vyizov himikam XXI veka. Himiya i zhizn. 2008. № 1. S. 50–55. [in Russian]

Petrov A. F., Koval Yu. I., Listkov V. Yu. Vliyanie razlichnyih form azotnyih udobreniy na urozhaynost tomata. Innovatsii i prodovolstvennaya bezopasnost. 2019. № 2. S. 145–150. [in Russian]

Pisarenko V. V. Marketing ovoschnoy produktsii (metodicheskie i prakticheskie aspektyi): marketingovoe issledovanie potrebiteley, roznichnogo i optovogo segmenta ryinka ovoschnoy produktsii / https://agromage.com/stat_id.php?id=325. [in Russian]

Pohorielova V. Vplyv zhyvlennia na vrozhainist tomativ. Plantator. 2020. № 3 (51). S. 22–25. [in Ukrainian]

Ponomarenko S. P. Regulyatoryi rosta rasteniy. Kiyiv : Institut bioorganicheskoy himii, 2003. 319 s. [in Russian]

Ponomarenko S. P. Ukrainski rehuliatory rostu roslyn. Elementy rehuliatsii v roslynnytstvi: zb. nauk. pr. 1998. S. 10–16. [in Ukrainian]

Popov A. I. Vozmozhnyie mehanizmyi deystviya guminovyih veschestv pri ih popadanii v rasteniya. Guminovyie veschestva v biosfere: trudyi 4 Vserossiyskoy konf., 19–21 dekabrya 2007 g. Moskva, 2007. S. 509–514. [in Russian]

Poprotska I. V. Zminy v polisakharydnomu kompleksi klitynnykh stinok simiadolei prorostkiv harbuza za riznoi napruzhenosti donorno-aktseptornykh vidnosyn v protsesi prorostannia. Fyzyolohyia y byokhymyia kult. rastenyi. 2014. № 3. S. 190–195. [in Ukrainian]

Rohach V. V., Rohach T. I. Vplyv syntetychnykh stymuliatoriv rostu na morfo-fiziolohichni kharakterystyky ta biolohichnu produktyvnist kartopli. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho un-tu. Seriia Biolohiia, ekolohiia. 2015. № 2. S. 221–224. [in Ukrainian]

Rozroblennia blok-skhemy vyrobnytstva tomatnoho ketchupu na osnovi kontsentrovanykh tomatoproduktiv / M. I. Valko ta in. Visnyk KhNTU. № 1 (64), 2018. S. 103–108. [in Ukrainian]

Sviridov A. V., Akaev O. P. Poluchenie iz torfa zhidkogo kompleksnogo nitroguminovogo udobreniya. Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova. Estestvoznanie. 2014. № 4. S. 24–26. [in Russian]

Skrylnyk Ye. V., Batsula O. O., Rozumna R. A. Perspektyvy i napriamky vyrobnytstva ta zastosuvannia orhano-mineralnykh dobryv i biostymuliatoriv v zemlerobstvi Ukrainy. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Pivdennoho rehionu. 2000. Vyp. 1. S. 223–228. [in Ukrainian]

Smirnov Yu. V., Vinogradova V. S. Mehanizm deystviya i funktsii guminovyih preparatov. Agrohimicheskiy vestnik. 2004. № 1. S. 22–23. [in Russian]

Ternavskyi A. H., Nakloka O. P. Efektyvnist zastosuvannia biostymuliatoriv rostu na roslynakh ohirka v umovakh Lisostepu Ukrainy. Ahrobiolohiia. 2013. № 11 (104). S.101–104. [in Ukrainian]

Ulianchenko O. V., Bezus R. M. Problemy ta tendentsii rozvytku orhanichnoho ovochivnytstva v Ukraini. Visnyk KhNAU im. V. V. Dokuchaieva. 2016. № 2. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky». S. 23–32. [in Ukrainian]

Fedorov A. O., Shkabara T. L., Fedorova V. O. Spozhyvcha kharakterystyka mikrokomponentiv kharchovykh produktiv. Tekhnolohiia kharchuvannia i tovaroznavstvo. 2013. № 2. S. 367–374. [in Ukrainian]

Hristeva L. A. K prirode deystviya fiziologicheski aktivnyih veschestv na rasteniya v ekstremalnyih usloviyah. Guminovyie udobreniya. Teoriya i praktika ih primeneniya. Dnepropetrovsk, 1977. S. 3–15. [in Russian]

Chukov S. N., Golubkov M. S. Sravnitelnoe izuchenie fiziologicheskoy aktivnosti gumusovyih kislot pochv na kulture vodorosley Chlorella vulgaris. Vestnik S. Peterburg. Un-ta. 2005. № 1. Ser. 3. S. 103–113. [in Russian]

Shevchuk M. I., Bortnik P. A., Bortnik T. M. Tekhnolohichni pidkhody do vyhotovlennia huminovykh preparativ. Aktualni problemy gruntoznavstva, zemlerobstva ta ahrokhimii: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet konf., prysviachenoi 95-richchiu utvorennia kafedry gruntoznavstva, zemlerobstva ta ahrokhimii LNAU ta Mizhnarodnomu Dniu ahrokhimika, 9–13 chervnia 2014 r. Lviv, 2014. S. 336–340. [in Ukrainian]

Effektivnost primeneniya pod ovoschnyie kulturyi organo-mineralnogo udobreniya, poluchennogo na osnove azotnokislotnoy pererabotki burogo uglya i fosforitov / N. H. Usanbaev i dr. Agrohimiya. 2016. № 11. S. 31–36. [in Russian]

Iarmolska O. Ie. Minlyvist urozhaiv tomativ v Ukraini. Fyzyolohyia rastenyi y henetyka. 2016. T. 48. № 1. S. 75–80. DOI: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FBKR_2016_48_1_11. [in Ukrainian]

Abdelhamid M. T., Selim E. M., EL-Ghamry A. M. In-tegrated Effects of Bio and Mineral Fertilizers and Humic Substances on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Contents of Fertigated Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Grown on Sandy Soils. Journal of Agronomy. 2011. № 10. Р. 34–39. DOI: 10.3923/ja.2011.34.39.

Andersson C. Quality of organically and conventionally grown potatoes: four-year study of micronutrients, metals, secondary metabolites, enzymic browning and organoleptic properties. Food Additives & Contaminants. 2005. V. 22. № 6. Р. 514–534.

Barrett D. M. Color quality of tomato products. Color quality of fresh and processed foods. ACS Symposium Series. 2008. Р. 131–139.

Barrett D. M. Future innovations in tomato processing. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 1081: XIII International Symposium on Processing Tomato. 2015. № 1081. Р. 49–55. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1081.3.

Bourn D., Prescott J. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced. Food Science & Nutrition. 2002. V. 42. № 1. Р.1–34.

Bonelli L. E., Monzon J. P., Cerrudo A., Rizzalli R. H., Andrade F. H. Maize grain yield components and source-sink relationship as affected by the delay in sowing date. Field Crops Res. 2016. № 198. P. 215–225.

Woese K., Lange D., Boess C. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods – results of a review of the relevant literature. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1997. № 74. Р. 281–293.

Combining Ability Analysis for Yield, Quality, Earliness, and Yield-Attributing Traits in Tomato. / A. Agarwal et. al. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 2017. № 23 (6). Р. 605–615. DOI: 10.1080/19315260.2017.1355864.

Chen Y., Aviad T. Effects of humic substances on plant growth. Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences. 1990. P. 161–186.

Effect of Organic/Inorganic-Cation Balanced Fertilizers on Yield and Temporal Nutrient Allocation of Tomato Fruits under Andosol Soil Conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa / L. B. Tonfack et al. International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research. 2013. Vol. 2. № 2. Р. 27–37.

Effects of organic and conventional methods on mineral content and taste parameters in tomato fruit / N. Kapoulas et al. Agriculture & Forestry. 2013. V. 59. № 3. Р. 23–34.

George E. F., Hall M. A., Klerk G. D. Plant Growth Regulators. Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. Dordrecht, 2008. С. 751–773.

Kataoka K., Sugimoto K., Ohashi H., Yamada H. Effect of Organo-mineral Fertilizer on Tomato Fruit Production and Incidence of Blossom-end Rot under Salinity. The Horticulture Journal. 2017. Vol. 86, № 3. P. 357–364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2503/hortj.OKD-041.

Metabolomic fingerprinting employing DART-TOFMS for authentication of tomatoes and peppers from organic and conventional farming / H. Novotna et al. Food Additives & Contaminants. 2012. V. 29. № 9. Р. 1335–1346.

Rady M. M. A novel organo-mineral fertilizer can mitigate salinity stress effects for tomato production on reclaimed saline soil. South African J. 2012. № 81. P. 8–14.

Rose M. T., Patti A. F., Little K. R., Brown A. L., Jackson W. R, Cavagnaro T. R. Meta-Analysis and Review of Plant-Growth Response to Humic Substances: Practical Implications for Agriculture. Advances in Agronomy. 2014. V. 124. P. 37–89.

Sahoo R. K., Bhardwaj D., Tuteja N. Biofertilizers: a sustainable eco-friendly agricultural approach to crop improvement. Plant Acclimation to Environmental Stress. New York: Springer, 2013. Р.403–432.

Yu S. M., Lo S. F., Ho T. D. Source-sink communication: Regulated by hormone, nutrient and stress cross-signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2015. № 20 (12). P. 844–857.

Effect of biostimulants to control the Phelipanche ramosa L. Pomel in processing tomato crop. / G. Disciglio et al. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering. 2016. Vol. 10, № 4. Р. 227–230. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1123783.

Vallverdu-Queralt A., Medina-Remon A., Casals-Ribes I. Is there any difference between the phenolic content of organic and conventional tomato juices? Food chemistry. 2012. V. 130. № 1. Р.222–227.

Total antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content and iron and zinc dialyzability in selected Greek varieties of table olives, tomatoes and legumes from conventional and organic farming / M. Drakou et al. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2015. V. 66. № 2. P. 197–202. DOI: 10.3109/09637486.2014.979320.

The Impact of Organic Farming on Quality of Tomatoes Is Associated to Increased Oxidative Stress during Fruit Development / A. B. Oliveira et al. PLoS ONE. 2015. V. 8. № 2. Р. 56–59. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0056354.

Willer H., Lernoud J. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2017. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, and IFOAM – Organics International, Bonn. Version 1.3 of February 20, 2017. URL: http://www.organic-world.net/yearbook/yearbook-2017.html (Last accessed: 22.09.2018).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25128/2078-2357.20.3-4.15

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 А. Yu. Dzendzel, Yu. D. Martsinyshyn, S. V. Pyda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.